Project states & relationships

Try. Add a project, inspect its permitted next states, then compare one journey with the batch summary.

Limits. An invented transition model; frequencies illustrate supplied probabilities rather than predict a real portfolio.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Place an unassigned card, move a workstream and split selected cards into another. Export and reload your board.

Limits. A local planning board. Its allocations do not establish legal scope, contractual obligations or acceptance.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

The traversal records each transition at most once across alternative markings. Its combined transition list need not be one executable firing sequence, so the displayed task structure and dates are illustrations, not a verified complete shed plan.

Try. Switch your role, inspect the stakeholder measures, and compare the charts with the source table.

Limits. Illustrative assessments and relationships, not surveyed evidence or a computed stakeholder strategy.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Raise Residents’ power from 30 to 70. Add a second stakeholder at the same position and inspect both.

Limits. Supplied judgements with a conventional split at 50. Scores do not measure support, rights or relationships, and low power does not justify exclusion.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Select a concept, read its incoming and outgoing relationships, then inspect concepts with no links yet.

Limits. A partial concept schema, not a measured social network. Unconnected concepts are visible gaps; positions and colours do not measure influence.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Select nodes and follow the links from outputs through outcomes to benefits. Move nodes to make a relationship easier to read.

Limits. A teaching example inspired by the railway, not an approved scope or evidence that benefits will occur.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Expand the trees and select Old Oak Common foundations on the work side. Follow its distinct product, then change phase to compare the supplied metrics.

Limits. Unverified legacy HS2 teaching inputs with no reliable reporting date. The left tree is a process hierarchy, not a standards-conformant WBS; metrics are supplied separately, not calculated roll-ups.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Count the deliveries, correct a count, and check each person out to complete the fictional checklist.

Limits. Page-local state only. Completing a checklist cannot establish that a real site is safe to close.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Fictional team situations introduce a projection of the public ontology. The explorer uses the paper’s abstract and deposited ontology; it does not assess the full study or validate the model.

Try. Change a transition weight or cutoff, run the walk, and inspect what counts as a trap.

Limits. Supplied relative weights and viability bands are model assumptions, not measured project probabilities or a formal viability kernel.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Insert interfaces along separate edges, then contrast a shared interface and inspect the added dependencies or cycle.

Limits. A supplied dependency model and bounded transformation checks; not a general fibration construction, resource scheduler or verified planning-system integration.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.