Delivery dynamics & feedback

Try. Add one unit to A, reset, then add one to B. One uses float; the other moves completion.

Limits. A deterministic finish-to-start network, without calendars, resources, lags, uncertainty or costs.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Collapse two serial steps and expand them again. Inspect the resource schedule, then test an explicitly assumed dependency change.

Limits. Illustrative activities and heuristic resource scheduling; a graph rewrite is not proof that real work is safely interchangeable.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Advance through the reviews and compare the beliefs, progress, recorded decisions and later outcomes.

Limits. Scripted teaching values, not variational or expected free-energy calculations, inferred policies or a validated Active Inference model.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Change an activity’s range or distribution assumption, rerun the simulation and compare the distribution with the baseline.

Limits. Probabilities describe the supplied model, not calibrated delivery confidence. Inputs and omitted risks still require judgement.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Select Security review, then select a task bar. Trace the associations across both charts; clear the selection to restore the whole picture.

Limits. Illustrative dates and elapsed decision times. No dated decisions, causal gating rules or dependency network are supplied, so the chart cannot attribute schedule delay or calculate a critical path.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Set a budget, compare the time–cost frontier and inspect the selected schedule alongside the procurement proposal.

Limits. Exact only within the bounded supplied crash menus and precedence model; excludes shared resource constraints and validated incentive payments.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Inputs. Six named activities and editable, binary information dependencies. A mark means that the row activity receives information from the column activity.

Try this. Compare the one-feedback-group and one-way-flow examples. Change a dependency and inspect which activities belong together. The second tab separately illustrates a change of coordinates.

Limits. Dependency groups do not supply a feasible schedule. This example has no durations, resource capacities, coupling strengths or iteration counts; its three rational-matrix examples are not a general solver.

The app explicitly records a revision on 20 September 2026, correcting an earlier comparison from June 2025. This is the app's revision date, not a claim about later use.

Maintained source; original revision recorded · Current model checks and their scope

Try. Clarify scope, compare local and neighbouring changes, then alter a coupling assumption and undo the intervention.

Limits. Invented coefficients and a simple equal-weight index illustrate assumptions rather than predict organisational performance.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Advance a week, switch effects off and on, then run and reset. Read the event log alongside the trajectory.

Limits. Invented stochastic rules and coefficients, not calibrated project forecasts. Reset keeps your effect choices.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Change storage or transport, then compare a seeded run with a stress ensemble and inspect unfinished inventory.

Limits. A fictional fractional-flow experiment with stated timing and accounting rules. It is not a live digital twin or a physical hazard forecast.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Download the model, load it into NetLogo Web, set worker count, then run setup and go.

Limits. A small occupancy illustration with fixed schedules. It cannot establish safe staffing, site capacity or construction logistics.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Change a gain, follow its contribution through a feedback loop, and compare the trajectory with the stability calculation.

Limits. A discrete linear teaching model with supplied gains; it does not simulate nuclear governance, regulatory approval or a calibrated delivery system.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Select a node to follow its incident dependencies, then inspect dated activities and calendar overlaps in the timeline.

Limits. Illustrative relationships and dates. Calendar overlap alone does not prove resource conflict, criticality or delay.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Use three areas and three teams; increase the cost per cross-team pair until splitting costs more.

Limits. Invented cost functions and equal-weight areas; no empirical capacity threshold or calibrated organisational model.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.