Capabilities & futures

Try. Choose Performance and apply its levels, then switch to Capability. Compare keeping those levels with applying the new suggestion.

Limits. A fixed conversation heuristic; it does not diagnose a project, perform a P3M3 assessment or validate a service’s suitability.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Change a current and target assessment, inspect coverage and gaps, then export and reopen your edited hierarchy.

Limits. An authored checklist and fictional example, not P3M3 or a validated maturity assessment.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Filter by role, add questions from two packs and reorder them. Reopen the run-sheet with its follow-ups and coaching notes.

Limits. Authored facilitation prompts, not a validated diagnostic or causal test. Answers need evidence and alternative explanations.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Focus or select a capability, read its description, and follow its connections.

Limits. A historical conceptual map, not a current model ranking, benchmark or proof that the suggested combination works.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Browser-local ideas and comments. No shared review, approval or project-tracking workflow.

Try. Raise two scores for one firm to 10, then lower one. Watch the empty upper-right region close and reopen before moving the entrant sliders.

Limits. Invented scores and a 0.1-grid geometric search. Empty areas do not establish demand, feasibility, competitor capability or a commercial opportunity.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 2 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Trace a milestone, then compare the controls diagram and inspect its placement assumptions.

Limits. Selected events and an interpretive arrangement; connections are not evidence of product inheritance or a forecast.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Choose a story, move through its periods, and compare its assumptions with the alternatives.

Limits. Preserved authored scenario narratives, not forecasts or evidence that a dated AGI, ASI or market event happened.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Shift a scenario window and compare pressure at a milestone; inspect the opposing effects behind a small net value.

Limits. Authored triangular activations and signed effects, not probabilities, calibrated forecasts or a robust optimisation method.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.

Try. Compare an ordinary offer with an AI-assisted option, then inspect the evidence needed to know whether either helps.

Limits. Design prompts and candidate measures, not a vendor catalogue, delivered capability or demonstrated performance.

Earlier example, repaired and reviewed 3 October 2026. This review checks the stated model and interactions; it does not establish usefulness in practice.